Culture encompasses a range of practices, tools, social networks, and ways of engaging with the world.
The issue at hand is the need for science teaching to embrace culturally responsive and sustaining instruction to promote equity in education, all the while promoting engagement and collaboration in the development and progress of science and technology in our society. This approach recognizes that all learning is inherently cultural and seeks to make meaningful connections between scientific concepts and the cultural knowledge, experiences, and ways of knowing of students and their communities. However, implementing culturally responsive science instruction is complex and requires careful navigation to avoid complications and dispel prevalent myths. It involves acknowledging the historical and dynamic nature of culture, understanding the inherent variation within cultural communities, and addressing issues of power and sovereignty when responsibly connecting to culture. (Bell, Rodriguez, Tzou, & Morrison, 2018) But in reality, how does these pedagogies and instructions impact science and technology in societal level?
Responsive and Relevant Instructions and Pedagogies in STEM
5E Model of Instruction
The 5E instructional model, developed by Roger Bybee, is a pedagogical approach aimed at fostering engaging and meaningful learning experiences for students. (Lesley University, n.d.) It comprises five phases: Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate. The Engage phase captivates students’ interest and activates prior knowledge, while the Explore phase encourages hands-on exploration and inquiry. In the Explain phase, teachers provide explanations and concepts to solidify understanding, followed by the Elaborate phase, where students deepen their knowledge through additional activities. Finally, the Evaluate phase assesses student learning outcomes. This model promotes active engagement, inquiry-based learning, and critical thinking, empowering students to construct their own understanding of the subject matter.
Culturally Responsive and Relevant Pedagogies
In an inclusive education system, students thrive when they see themselves represented in the curriculum, physical environment, and broader community, fostering engagement and empowerment. Ontario educators prioritize culturally responsive and relevant pedagogy (CRRP), acknowledging diverse learning styles tied to background, language, and identity (Ontario Ministry of Education, 2022). Embracing CRRP fosters positive environments, student success, parent-school relationships, and community ties while promoting introspection to combat biases and create inclusive spaces. By understanding student diversity, educators can tailor policies, programs, and practices to ensure equitable opportunities for success. Implementing inclusive education principles across school life cultivates high achievement, affirming student worth and fostering respect for diversity. Teachers play a pivotal role by incorporating diverse perspectives into the curriculum and adapting instruction to meet individual needs. School-community interactions should mirror societal diversity, encouraging parental and community involvement through various outreach strategies. Effective inclusive education hinges on proactive efforts to embrace diversity and create welcoming environments for all students and families.
Integration with the Science and Technology Curriculum
The integration of the 5E Model of Instruction and Culturally Relevant and Responsive Pedagogies can greatly enhance the success of each student in several ways (Watson, 2021):
Engagement: The 5E Model, with its emphasis on engaging students in hands-on experiences and inquiry-based learning, combined with culturally relevant content and experiences, can capture students’ interest and motivation. By connecting learning to students’ cultural backgrounds and experiences, they are more likely to feel personally invested in the learning process.
Relevance: Culturally relevant and responsive pedagogies ensure that instructional content is meaningful and relatable to students’ lives. When learning experiences align with students’ cultural contexts and experiences, they are more likely to see the relevance of what they are learning and understand how it applies to their own lives and communities.
Inclusivity: By incorporating diverse perspectives, voices, and experiences into the curriculum, the integration of culturally relevant and responsive pedagogies fosters a sense of belonging and inclusivity in the classroom. Students from all cultural backgrounds see themselves reflected in the curriculum, which can lead to increased engagement and participation.
Empowerment: Culturally relevant and responsive pedagogies empower students by validating their identities, experiences, and knowledge. When students see their cultures and backgrounds represented in the curriculum, they are more likely to feel valued and confident in their abilities to succeed academically.
Critical Thinking: The 5E Model promotes critical thinking skills by encouraging students to explore, question, and analyze scientific concepts. When combined with culturally relevant content and experiences, students are challenged to think critically about how scientific knowledge intersects with their own cultural perspectives and worldviews.
Cultural Competence: Integrating culturally relevant and responsive pedagogies helps students develop cultural competence by fostering an understanding and appreciation of diverse cultures and perspectives. This prepares students to navigate an increasingly diverse world and work collaboratively with individuals from different backgrounds.
Academic Achievement: Ultimately, the combination of the 5E Model of Instruction and Culturally Relevant and Responsive Pedagogies can lead to improved academic achievement for all students. By engaging students, making learning relevant, fostering inclusivity, empowering students, promoting critical thinking, and developing cultural competence, this integrated approach creates a supportive learning environment where every student has the opportunity to succeed.
Implications on Science and Technology
The integration of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) into the realm of science and technology has emerged as a catalyst for transformative change, propelling the field towards enhanced innovation and creativity. By cultivating environments where students and indivudalsd from diverse backgrounds bring unique perspectives to the table, DEI not only fuels increased innovation but also fosters creativity in research and problem-solving endeavors.
This inclusive approach not only leads to enriched scientific outcomes but also cultivates a collaborative ecosystem where the exchange of ideas among scientists from different backgrounds elevates the quality and rigor of research. However, as we delve deeper into the intersection of DEI and scientific inquiry, questions arise: How can we ensure that DEI initiatives are effectively implemented across scientific disciplines and institutions? What strategies can be employed to dismantle systemic barriers and ensure equitable access to opportunities in STEM fields for historically marginalized groups? Furthermore, how do we navigate the ethical considerations inherent in promoting DEI in science, ensuring that our advancements benefit all members of society and address the diverse needs of communities worldwide? As we strive to address these questions, it becomes evident that the journey towards leveraging DEI to drive innovation, address societal challenges, and uphold ethical standards in scientific practice is both imperative and ongoing.
Enhanced Innovation and Creativity: DEI in science fosters an environment where individuals from diverse backgrounds bring unique perspectives, leading to increased innovation and creativity in research and problem-solving.
Improved Research Quality: Inclusive environments promote collaboration and the exchange of ideas among scientists from different backgrounds, which enhances the quality and rigor of scientific research.
Addressing Societal Challenges: DEI in science enables the scientific community to better address complex societal challenges by incorporating diverse viewpoints and experiences into research and decision-making processes.
Enhanced Access and Representation: Promoting DEI in science ensures that historically marginalized groups have equal access to opportunities in STEM fields, leading to increased representation and diversity within the scientific community.
Ethical Considerations: DEI in science involves ethical considerations related to fairness, justice, and accountability in research practices. It ensures that scientific advancements are beneficial to all members of society and address the needs of diverse communities.
By fostering inclusive environments that value diverse perspectives and experiences, the scientific community can drive forward advancements that benefit society as a whole. However, this raises further questions for exploration. How can we ensure that DEI efforts in science are sustained and effectively implemented across institutions and disciplines, especially in the beginning stages of learning? What strategies can be employed to address systemic barriers and promote equitable opportunities for underrepresented groups in STEM fields? How can the scientific community continue to engage with diverse communities and address their specific needs and concerns? By continuing to explore these questions and prioritize DEI initiatives, we can further advance scientific progress while promoting fairness, justice, and accountability in research practices.
Conclusion
Culturally Relevant Pedagogy (CRRP) and the 5E Model of instruction have profound implications for bridging the gap between the classroom and the real world within the context of science and technology education. By integrating CRRP into the 5E Model, educators can create learning experiences that resonate with students’ cultural backgrounds and identities, making science and technology more accessible and meaningful. This approach acknowledges and values students’ diverse perspectives, allowing them to see themselves reflected in the curriculum and fostering a sense of belonging and empowerment. As students engage in hands-on exploration, explanation, and elaboration within the 5E framework, they not only develop a deeper understanding of scientific concepts but also gain essential skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration. Moreover, by connecting classroom learning to real-world issues and contexts relevant to students’ lives, CRRP and the 5E Model encourage students to apply their knowledge and skills to solve authentic problems and make positive contributions to their communities. Ultimately, this integrated approach not only enhances students’ academic achievement but also equips them with the tools and mindset needed to address real-world challenges in science and technology with cultural sensitivity and social responsibility.
References
Bell, P., Rodriguez, A. J., Tzou, C., & Morrison, D. (February 2018). How to avoid known pitfalls associated with culturally responsive instruction. STEM Teaching Tools. Retrieved from https://stemteachingtools.org/brief/53
Lesley University. (n.d.). Empowering students: The 5E model explained. Retrieved from https://lesley.edu/article/empowering-students-the-5e-model-explained
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2022). The Ontario Curriculum Grades 1–8 – Science and Technology 2022. Retrieved from https://assets-us-01.kc-usercontent.com/fbd574c4-da36-0066-a0c5-849ffb2de96e/2674c944-8ede-43d8-aa39-55156a0468ac/The%20Ontario%20Curriculum%20Grades%201–8%20–%20Science%20and%20Technology%202022.pdf
Watson, S. (2021). Culturally Relevant Pedagogy and the 5E Lesson Plan. Science Teacher, 56.
Holoien, D. S. (2013). Do differences make a difference? The effects of diversity on learning, intergroup outcomes, and civic engagement. Trustee Ad Hoc Committee on Diversity, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. Retrieved from http://www.princeton.edu/reports/2013/diversity
OntarioScienceCentre. (2022). Black Youth Thriving in STEM: Setting Optimal Conditions for Deep Learning [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkIXXQTEGMs&list=PLWJ3p5pi7LDEls45dP4MCQlT-xWM1t59q&index=13
ralvarez.ca 